Victor Bugliosi, author of Helter Skelter and the newly released "The Prosecution of George W Bush for Murder", as well as, arguably the greatest prosecuting attorney's of our time, discusses the serious legal implications that we must adhere to as a civilized society of truth and justice. If the charge turns out to be true, it means the White House manufactured evidence to bolster one of its major rationales for the Iraq invasion: that Saddam Hussein aided and abetted al-Qaida. The White House adamantly denies it forged the letter. Lost in the shuffle of the coverage is that the letter also lays out another important, but debunked, rationale that was central to the Bush administration's justification for invading Iraq -- one that was based on documents now known to be forged.
Here's Con Coughlin, the Sunday Telegraph reporter, who first wrote about the letter back in 2003 (via the Anonymous Liberal):
The second item [in the letter] explains how Iraqi intelligence, helped by "a small team from the al-Qaeda organization," arranged for an (unspecified) shipment from Niger to reach Baghdad by way of Libya and Syria.Iraqi officials believe this is a reference to the controversial shipments of uranium ore that Iraq acquired from Niger to aid Saddam in his efforts to develop an atom bomb.
If you remember, the Niger uranium story was a linchpin in the Bush administration's case for the war. Secretary of State Colin Powell assured the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in September 2002 that Iraq had attempted to acquire uranium ore from Niger. President Bush pushed the claim with the infamous "16 words"
The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa. Our intelligence sources tell us that he has attempted to purchase high-strength aluminum tubes suitable for nuclear weapons production. Saddam Hussein has not credibly explained these activities. He clearly has much to hide.
in his famed State of The Union address in January 2003. The story also touched off the Valerie Plame affair when Plame's husband, Joseph Wilson, questioned the tale's veracity in an Op-Ed in the New York Times.
The Niger uranium story unraveled quickly. Even before the Iraq invasion in March 2003, International Atomic Energy Agency director Mohamed ElBaradei, reported that his agency had determined, with the help of outside experts, that the documents were "not authentic." One of those outside experts was, reportedly, Google. You may also recall that there were serious questions about the role of Bush administration officials, specifically current National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley, in the acquisition of these forged documents.
We are certainly in some serious legal territory to which Bugliosi shows us the validity to legal grounds for prosecution for a variety of actions from Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice and others.There is no reason, as a modern civilized society, that we should NOT let this go without legal repercussions simply because of their held power. If we let this pass by us, as that civilized society, we then tread on thin ice as to the creation of precident to future leaders of this country. We are coming very close to losing our status as a free republic and entering into the realm of a democratically elected dictatorship.
That does not say that the elections are fair whatsoever...
Special Thanks to Alex Koppelman and Justin Jouvenal for content and writing
No comments:
Post a Comment